Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature

TitleSpecies names in phylogenetic nomenclature
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication1999
AuthorsCantino PD, Bryant HN, de Queiroz K, Donoghue MJ, Eriksson T, Hillis DM, S Y Lee M
JournalSystematic Biology
Volume48
Pagination790 - 807
ISSN10635157
Abstract

Linnaean binomial nomenclature is logically incompatible with the phylogenetic nomenclature of de Queiroz and Gauthier (1992, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-480): The former is based on the concept of genus, thus making this rank mandatory, while the latter is based on phylogenetic definitions and requires the abandonment of mandatory ranks. Thus, if species are to receive names under phylogenetic nomenclature, a different method must be devised to name them. Here, 13 methods for naming species in the context of phylogenetic nomenclature are contrasted with each other and with Linnaean binomials. A fundamental dichotomy among the proposed methods distinguishes those that retain the entire binomial of a preexisting species name from those that retain only the specific epithet. Other relevant issues include the stability, uniqueness, and ease of pronunciation of species names; their capacity to convey phylogenetic information; and the distinguishability of species names that are governed

URLhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=3343170&site=eds-live